e99ting

156 The popular version of oakley sunglasses Keynesian theory has overlooked the fact that even if the total payments for wages and consumer spending declined, sales of businesses would not go back as far as possible reduce wages rising cost of capital goods. In fact, if the additional costcheap oakley sunglasses of capital in the payment of wages and the use of payment of salary support not only the revenues to remain in business as well, but this is especially important for the economic recovery process is worth the same amount of total profits of the proceeds will be real growth. This result is due to the fact that wages are generally fairly quickly, usually within a few weeks or months, their costs, revenues in the calculation of benefits should be removed. In contrast, spending on hardware that does not seem to have an equivalent cost of sales for several years and older may be deducted under the depreciation of machinery. And it seems that the costs for building materials and services construction equipment at a cost equivalent to a reduction in sales for several decades, the life according to buildings and other depreciable assetsray ban sunglasses at very durable. Because sport sunglassesof these considerations, if such an amount $ 100 000 000 000, for example, could be away from their wages, the economic system and the purchase of equipment and facilities could benefit the economy of about $ 90 to 95 billion oakley sunglasses increase in dollars year in which this change occurred on spending. This is because the $ 100 000 000 000 expenditure on capital equipment, which will be held today, would be fully representative of what the full cost of raw materials in U.S. dollars to 100 billion U.S. dollars of the costs of corporate earnings on consumer goods, workers do otherwise. At the same time would be 100 billion dollars in wage payments in the same year to 100 billion U.S. dollars to deduct the cost of sales, 100 billion U.S. dollars of capital spending on goods with a payback period of several years to several decades, may see also a mere $ 5 to $ 10 billion in depreciation costs for a given year. The replacement of 100 billion U.S. dollars in labor costs by 5 to $ 10.000.000.000 dollars of depreciation implies an increase in total profits of 90 to $ 95 billion U.S. dollars with Some readers may wonder how it is possible to have more capital goods at the same time, appearing less than the purchase of consumer goods. Less expenditure on consumer goods, it seems, would require less expenditure for capital goods industry with means to produce consumer goods. The answer lies in the fact that during this applies to capital expenditure on consumer goods fell to a lesser extent than the cost of acquisition of consumer goods for production. This now means that a greater proportion of spending on consumer goods. To buy, in turn, spending on capital goods for the production of capital goods is a greater proportion of spending on consumer goods and so forth, spending on capital equipment, compounded every stage production. allow the next set of numbers to illustrate what is at stake then imagine that initially the cost of consumer goods in the economy, 500 units of money, spending on capital equipment industry Consumption goods amounted to 250 units of money, spending on capital goods industry is capital goods, 125 units of money, and so on, any amount of future expenditures for capital goods than half of capital spending on goods industry, helping to produce.